Use case · Biotech

Osseus for Biotech. On the same research brain.

Osseus connects the tools your teams already use, scattered documents, and the knowledge in peoples' heads into one permissioned research brain. It gives every person a proactive agent that surfaces the evidence, the expert, and the next action before time and money are wasted.

Book a demo See the workflows ↓

Workflows

Built for Biotech, on the same research brain.

01 / 06

R&D enterprise search

Ask across everything. Get one cited answer.

Ask one question instead of searching through dozens of documents and asking multiple people who might know. Osseus searches the connected engineering and scientific systems and returns one cited answer, the accountable owner, and a reviewable next step.

In practiceAsk: “Which internal runs used these conditions, and where did comparable experiments fail?” Osseus reasons across Benchling, LIMS, FlowJo, GraphPad, PubMed, and bioRxiv. It cites each claim, names Dr. Amina Okafor, states uncertainty, and offers a reviewable experiment plan.
  • Reasons over scientific records and analysis outputs, not only office documents.
  • Returns citations, relationship path, expert, confidence, and conflicting evidence.
  • Lets the scientist approve, edit, or reject the proposed next experiment.
02 / 06

Proactive experiment context

Bring prior feed-timing evidence into the run while it still matters.

Osseus compares a new result with internal run history and relevant literature before the team repeats a known process condition.

In practiceRun 14 in Benchling records a final titer of 3.9 g/L after CB7a feed began on Day 3. Osseus matches that timing to an unpublished 2024 run that also stalled, then shows that Priya Nair moved the feed to Day 2 and reached 4.7 g/L. A related bioRxiv preprint reports the same Day 2 shift. The scientist can compare the protocols or contact Priya before changing the next run.
  • Links the observed titer to the exact feed timing in comparable internal work.
  • Shows the successful internal adjustment, external evidence, and scientist who ran it.
  • Offers comparison and expert contact without changing the protocol or run.
03 / 06

Reproducibility & decision history

Compare a new run with the reproducibility evidence already available.

Osseus brings comparable internal runs, the validated reference method, open deviations, and the responsible assay lead into view before execution.

In practiceAs Run 22 for the LumaPlex IL-6 assay is queued in Benchling, Osseus shows that only four of eight comparable LumaPlex runs met the accepted range and two had the same high-variability pattern, while reference method ELISA-17 passed nine of ten comparable runs. It also surfaces VAL-118, two open deviations, and Dr. Maya Chen as assay-development lead so the scientist can compare methods before execution begins.
  • Compares like-for-like internal runs against the stated acceptance range.
  • Shows the reference method, open validation and deviation context, and accountable assay lead.
  • Leaves the run and method decision with the scientist after the evidence review.
04 / 06

Protocol currency & reproducibility

Keep reused protocols aligned with effective procedures.

Osseus checks the controlled procedure cited by a Benchling protocol before a scientist creates the next experiment.

In practiceA scientist selects “Use in new experiment” for CHO-FB-014 in Benchling. Osseus finds that the protocol still cites SOP-204 Rev 6 and a Day 3 CB7a feed, while effective Rev 8 requires Day 2. It attaches deviation DEV-219 and validation record VAL-042, then routes the comparison to Lena Ortiz in Quality Systems before a new run is created.
  • Checks the controlled reference at the moment a protocol is selected for reuse.
  • Shows the exact Rev 6 to Rev 8 instruction change with deviation and validation evidence.
  • Does not edit Benchling or controlled content and leaves approval with Quality Systems.
05 / 06

Onboarding & expertise

Onboarding that doesn’t drain your senior scientists.

New hires use a live map of projects, owners, tools, and decisions. They can answer routine questions from cited sources and bring judgment calls to the right expert.

In practiceA new scientist opens the cell-therapy project and sees how Benchling, LIMS, FlowJo, GraphPad, and Dotmatics relate. Osseus answers routine protocol and ownership questions from cited current sources, identifies Dr. Amina Okafor for exceptions, and prepares training and access tasks for approval.
  • Shows project, sample, run, protocol, decision, tool, and expert relationships.
  • Flags stale or conflicting guidance instead of treating it as current.
  • Reduces repetitive orientation work without replacing scientific mentorship.
Interactive demo — click a tab, expert, or document link
06 / 06

Memory API for your agents

Your agents, on the same governed memory.

Connect your own agents to the memory layer through an API: permission-scoped evidence, cited relationships, and actions that go through the same human approval.

In practiceAn internal experiment-planning agent queries a target condition and receives cited Benchling, LIMS, FlowJo, GraphPad, and literature evidence within the caller’s access. It proposes a pilot work list; Dr. Amina Okafor approves selected actions; and Osseus writes and verifies only those drafts and tasks.
  • Use Osseus automations, customer-built scientific agents, or both.
  • Ground outputs in cited internal evidence, literature, decisions, and expertise.
  • Keep protocol and execution actions permission-scoped and human-approved.

We’ll work alongside your team to identify the highest-value workflows and build custom solutions around them. The same underlying research brain powers them all. Get a demo.

How Osseus helps Biotech teams.

Osseus brings prior failures, decision history, and the accountable owner into the workflow before triage. Every action still requires human approval.

R&D enterprise search

Ask one question instead of searching through dozens of documents and asking multiple people who might know. Osseus searches the connected engineering and scientific systems and returns one cited answer, the accountable owner, and a reviewable next step.

Proactive experiment context

Osseus compares a new result with internal run history and relevant literature before the team repeats a known process condition.

Reproducibility & decision history

Osseus brings comparable internal runs, the validated reference method, open deviations, and the responsible assay lead into view before execution.

Protocol currency & reproducibility

Osseus checks the controlled procedure cited by a Benchling protocol before a scientist creates the next experiment.

Onboarding & expertise

New hires use a live map of projects, owners, tools, and decisions. They can answer routine questions from cited sources and bring judgment calls to the right expert.

Memory API for your agents

Connect your own agents to the memory layer through an API: permission-scoped evidence, cited relationships, and actions that go through the same human approval.

Curious what this looks like on your stack?

Book a demo